@misc{Karras2021,
title = {#IKEMClimateFinanceWeek: Germany - Legal barriers to the decarbonisation of dwellings occupied by low-income tenants and financial incentives to overcome these barriers},
author = {Jana Karras and Aleksandra Novikova},
url = {https://www.ikem.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Brief_5_Legal-barriers-to-the-decarbonisation-of-dwellings.pdf},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-05-21},
keywords = {Gebäude, Klimafinanzierung, Wärmewende},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{Novikova2021bc,
title = {#IKEMClimateFinanceWeek: Lessons learned from financing energy efficiency in multi-residential buildings in Lithuania},
author = {Aleksandra Novikova and Marina Olshanksaya and Kęstutis Kupšys and Rimantė Balsiūnaitė and Mats Dunkel},
url = {https://www.ikem.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Brief.4_Lessons-learned-from-financing-energy-efficiency-in-multi-residential-buildings-in-Lithuania.pdf},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-05-20},
abstract = {In 2020, the European Commission launched the Renovation Wave initiative, which aims to double the renovation rate of European buildings in the next 10 years and contribute significantly to the decarbonisation of the EU building sector by 2050. Furthermore, it intends to improve energy and resource efficiency and reduce energy bills while improving the health, comfort and wellbeing of all Europeans, including those who can least afford the necessary investments. The question is how this goal can be achieved, as renovating the whole existing building stock to a very high level of energy and carbon performance entails high upfront costs. In different European countries, such costs can range from 1.5% to 3.5% of national GDP per year over the next 30 years.
While the initiative is new, the challenge is not: it has been discussed for more than a decade in several countries. Some of these countries have also made their best attempts to address it; these efforts do not appear to have resolved the issue, however, as the challenge remains. Nevertheless, such experiences may offer very valuable lessons on what worked, what did not, and what improvements can be made in the next steps.
One such experience is the financing of energy efficiency in multi-residential buildings in Lithuania over the last two decades, which has been recognised as a best-practice example both domestically and at a European level. The action was launched by the World Bank pilot project in 1996, with later funding provided from the national public budget, followed by even more funding from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) and finally by funds from a growing number of private financiers. While the action was designed to help countries meet their greenhouse gas (GHG) emission-reduction commitments, it generated other benefits in the form of jobs, support to small and medium enterprises, higher bank liquidity and a decrease in energy poverty. This process was not without its challenges, however, and some of these persist. This brief discusses these challenges, along with tested solutions and lessons learned, with a focus on energy poverty.},
keywords = {Gebäude, Klimafinanzierung, Wärmewende},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{Novikova2021,
title = {#IKEMClimateFinanceWeek: Tracking investment to meet 2030 energy & climate targets in Germany, Czechia & Latvia},
author = {Aleksandra Novikova and Michaela Valentová and Agris Kamenders},
url = {https://www.ikem.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Brief.3_CIC2030-project-1-1.pdf},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-05-19},
abstract = {In 2020, EU Member States released National Energy and Action Plans (NECPs), which explained how each state would meet the
2030 energy and climate targets. From 2018–2021, the Institute for Climate Protection, Energy and Mobility (IKEM), Czech Technical
University in Prague (ČVUT), Riga Technical University (RTU), and Climate&Company participated in the joint project Climate
Investment Capacity 2030, which provided evidence-based information for the development and implementation of NECPs in Germany,
Czechia and Latvia. The project results were co-designed with national policymakers, the financing sector and other stakeholders to address
specific needs, share expertise and integrate findings into decision-making.1 The analysis covered the following aspects:
• investment needs to reach the 2030 climate and energy targets,
• investment maps to track public finance and private investment flows into climate and energy transition actions,
• capital raising plans to close the gap between the need and the current investment flows, and
• investment and policy plans for the most carbon-intensive industrial branches.},
keywords = {Investment map, Klimafinanzierung},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{IKEM2021,
title = {Gesetzesentwurf zum autonomen Fahren: Projektübergreifende Stellungnahme},
author = {IKEM},
url = {https://www.ikem.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Stellungnahme_Gesetzesentwurf-zum-autonomen-Fahren.pdf},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-04-09},
abstract = {Der Gesetzesentwurf zum autonomen Fahren ist ein guter Start für die Mobilität von Morgen. An einigen Stellen bestehen allerdings noch Unklarheiten und Regulierungslücken, wie zum Beispiel bei der Berücksichtigung externen Infrastruktur und der klaren Orientierung auf ÖPNV Anwendungen, unter den Leitgedanken Umweltschutz und Daseinsvorsorge im Mobilitätsbereich. Zu diesem Ergebnis kommt eine Stellungnahme des IKEM.  },
howpublished = {Stellungnahme},
keywords = {Autonomes Fahren, BMVI, HEAT, Hub Chain, Mobilität, Stellungnahme},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}